Back in Time Tuesday: The Art-Lover
Let's see. This one is 35 years old! I must have been doodling instead of taking notes in school...!
I picked this one out today for a few reasons:
-
I remember being really proud of it at the time - people are hard to draw!
-
I remember working on it for a while... if I concentrate, I can still smell a classroom, and feel my hand putting down the dots with the pen, and sense the stillness in the room. I can even, I think, remember which way I was facing in the classroom. Wild!
-
It definitely hits one of my early interests, which is intricate clothing, without trying to hew too closely to any received wisdom on historical fashion... I just liked bodices, and ribbons, and off the shoulder dresses, and weird braid cuffs that also include ribbons? Whatever. Teen Me was gonna do what she was gonna do
-
It also hits a lot of my visual hallmarks: the figure is askew on the page intentionally (yes, this is the actual orientation of the figure on the page), and the hair is... ignoring that skew to hang at some other angle... and the ribbons are blowing in a wind that makes no sense if you're reading the hair. Jaguar does not care for physics. Jaguar cares only for Fwoosh.
I did several more in this "series" but this one sticks with me the longest because it was the first, and the most "free" (the next ones try to copy real fashion trends), and because, despite its many flaws and inaccuracies, it has a spriteliness that the others lack. (Photographed here so you can see what I mean).
Going this far back into my archive has been... really interesting to me. A historical glimpse, not only into my development, but into the transitional period: being an artist before the internet, and being an artist before digital art. The other day I was observing how many artists now photobash references, trace them, then develop them from there, and how this is simply how people draw now. Everything is faster, easier to source, the expectations are different... so different, in fact, that it's like I sprang from some alien world. I'd have to explain to a young artist that, for instance, when I was drawing historical costumes as a teenager, I was having to remember them from movies (and you didn't even pause movies easily back in the VHS days, to get stills), or from plates in books (that often weren't in color!). The historical accuracies and inaccuracies of these Teen images represent the paucity of reference material and the inability to easily acquire it, as well as my skill level.
This is hard to imagine for someone who can grab their eight favorite references from a web search, save them, paste them onto the back layer of their piece and reduce the opacity, copy the embroidery, clone it onto their top layer's dress, trace the sleeve, enlarge and rotate it, then add more bows to it for fun.
When people with this kind of process tell me that AI art doesn't involve "real work", I wonder if they understand what their workflow looks like to me!
I'm not judging, because I don't actually care (weird to have arrived at this place, but I have!). What I care about is doing what I feel fulfilled doing, and for me that's drawing by hand, even if it means the results aren't as impressive to look at. But I hope explaining some of the 'backstory' of how pieces like this were drawn helps make those results interesting.😊